Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Team Quiz Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Agama Hindu Pada Siswa

Abstract

Article 1 paragraph 1 of Law of the Republic of Indonesia. No. 20 of 2003 Education is a conscious and planned effort to create a learning atmosphere and learning process so that students actively develop their potential to have spiritual religious strength, self-control, personality, intelligence, noble morals, and skills needed by themselves, society, nation and state. However, based on observations in Class IV of Elementary School No. 6 Belok, student learning outcomes, especially in the subject of Hinduism, are still below the Learning Objective Achievement Criteria (KKTP) set by the school, namely 76, with the highest score of 80, ≤ 75% the lowest score of 50, ≤75% class average = 71, 85 ≥ 75% the number of students is 8 people. This fact shows that there are still efforts that must be implemented to improve student learning outcomes. The causes of low student learning outcomes, there are several factors including: (1) Teachers in the learning process still use the old paradigm where teachers provide knowledge to passive students, (2) During teaching and learning activities, students rarely ask questions, ideas or respond to questions and provide responses in the learning process. Types of classroom action research, data collection methods, observation, quizzes, and analysis using KKTP analysis. Classroom Action Research (CAR) with the research subjects of Hindu students of Class IV Semester 1 of SD No. 6 Belok in the 2023/2024 academic year totaling 8 people. The data collection method used a quiz with descriptive statistical data analysis techniques, with the results of the study showing an increase in student learning outcomes from pre-cycle, cycle 1 and cycle 2. Based on the results of the analysis of student learning outcomes data, the average class value (x), absorption capacity (DS) and Learning Completeness (KB) were obtained as follows: The average class value ( ) in the pre-cycle, cycle I, and cycle II were respectively: "71.85", "77.41" and "82.96", with a percentage increase from pre-cycle to cycle I, and from cycle I to cycle II respectively: "7.74%" and "7.17%., Student absorption capacity (DS) in the pre-cycle, cycle I, and cycle II respectively: "71.85%", "77.41%" and "82.96%", with a percentage increase from pre-cycle to cycle I, and from cycle I to cycle II respectively: "7.74%" and "7.17%. Student learning completion (KB) in the pre-cycle, cycle I, and cycle II were respectively "44.44%", "66.67%" and "85.19%", with the percentage increase from pre-cycle to cycle I, and from cycle I to cycle II respectively: "50.02%" and "27.78%".