KAYOMAN: ENTITAS SPASIAL MASYARAKAT PEDAWA YANG MENSUCIKAN SUMBER AIR MELALUI BASIS PELESTARIAN ALAM DAN KERANGKA KEBUDAYAAN BALI AGA
Keywords:
Kayoman, environmental revitalization, youthAbstract
The emergence of water area destruction has led to increased social ecological attention from the community. A sociological qualitative study was used to explore the role of the local community group in Pedawa Village, Banjar, Bali, namely the Kayoman Community, in the environmental revitalization of Pedawa Village. The method used in this research is qualitative with data collection techniques including observation, interviews, and document studies. The results of this study indicate that the Kayoman Community plays an important role in the environmental revitalization of Pedawa Village. The formation of a community called "Kayoman" has become one of the forms of environmental conservation. This organization was established by a group of young people who are aware of environmental sustainability in Pedawa. The community observes the deteriorating environmental conditions in Pedawa. Economic downturns have caused the community to neglect their surrounding environment. One of the issues faced is the difficulty in obtaining water, as many water sources are no longer functional, leading to frequent droughts. This is caused by the numerous water-intensive industrial crops grown by the community, such as coffee and cloves, which deplete water sources. Conditions like this will gradually damage the sustainability of the Pedawa environment. Through the Kayoman Community, the goal is to restore and maintain environmental sustainability continuously despite limitations, by carrying out various forms of initiatives such as planting bamboo and banyan trees in every forest near water sources.
References
Barkin, D., & Lemus, B. (2016). Third World Alternatives for Building Post-capitalist Worlds. Review of Radical Political Economics, 48(4), 569–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613416665828
Beck, E. J. (2016). Book Review: Scripture and Cosmology: Kyle Greenwood, Scripture and Cosmology: Reading the Bible Between the Ancient World and Modern Science. The Expository Times, 127(9), 463–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014524616639880g
Behr, H., & Shani, G. (2021). Rethinking Emancipation in a Critical IR: Normativity, Cosmology, and Pluriversal Dialogue. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 49(2), 368–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298211031983
Bond, C. G. (2018). Ecofeminist Epistemology in Vandana Shiva’s The Feminine Principle of Prakriti and Ivone Gebara’s Trinitarian Cosmology. Feminist Theology, 26(2), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0966735017738660
Borsos, D. C. (2015). Communicative Prajna: Cultivating Solidarity and Establishing Right Human Relations. International Communication Gazette, 77(5), 500–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048515586951
Cameron, W. R. (2023). Cosmology and Vigilance: Political Vanguardism in Saint-Simon and Blanqui. Political Theory, 1(1), 1–26.
Castree, N., Bellamy, R., & Osaka, S. (2021). The Future of Global Environmental Assessments: Making a Case for Fundamental Change. Anthropocene Review, 8(1), 56–82.
Datta, R. (2018). Traditional Storytelling: An Effective Indigenous Research Methodology and Its Implications for Environmental Research. AlterNative, 14(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177180117741351
Demeulenaere, E., Pasternak, S. Y., Rubinstein, D. H., Lovecraft, A. L., & Bond, S. M. I.-. (2021). Indigenous Spirituality Surrounding Serianthes Trees in Micronesia: Traditional Practice, Conservation, and Resistance. Social Compass, 68(4), 548–561.
Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., Lure, M. Mac, Otterstad, A. M., Torrance, H., Cannella, G. S., Ljungberg, M. K., & Tier, T. M. (2017). Critical Qualitative Methodologies: Reconceptualizations and Emergent Construction. International Review of Qualitative Research, 10(4), 482–498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2017.10.4.482
Duarte, L. F. D. (2021). The Vitality of Vitalism in Contemporary Anthropology: Longing for an Ever Green Tree of Life. Anthropological Theory, 21(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499620923546
Fuller, M. G. (2017). Great Spatial Expectations: On Three Objects, Two Communities and One House. Current Sociology, 65(4), 603–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392117694071
Furlong, D. E., & Lester, J. N. (2022). Toward a Practice of Qualitative Methodological Literature Reviewing. Qualitative Inquiry, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004221131028
Gabrys, J. (2019). Sensors and Sensing Practices: Reworking Experience across Entities, Environments, and Technologies. Science Technology and Human Values, 44(5), 723–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919860211
Ganguly, T. (2023). The Wonder of Darshan: Going Beyond The Local and The National. Studies in Religion-Sciences Religieuses, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/00084298231156129
Gearey, M., & Ravenscroft, N. (2019). The Nowtopia of The Riverbank: Elder Environmental Activism. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 2(3), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848619843733
Grumley, J. (2015). The Paradoxes of Democratic Life: Markus and Honneth on Freedom. Thesis Eleven, 126(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513614566916
Haraway, D. (2018). Staying With The Trouble for Multispecies Environmental Justice. Dialogues in Human Geography, 8(1), 102–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820617739208
Harney, L., Curry, J. M., Scott, J., & Wills, J. (2016). Developing ‘Process Pragmatism’ to Underpin Engaged Research in Human Geography. Progress in Human Geography, 40(3), 316–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515623367
Harrington, C. (2016). The Ends of the World: International Relations and the Anthropocene. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(3), 478–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829816638745
Hernandez, K. J., Rubis, J. M., Theriault, N., Todd, Z., Mitchell, A., Country, B., Burarrwanga, L., Ganambarr, R., Stubbs, M. G.-, Ganambarr, B., Maymuru, D., Pearson, S. S.-, Lloyd, K., & Wright, S. (2021). The Creatures Collective: Manifestings. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 4(3), 838–863.
Hird, M. J. (2017). Waste, Environmental Politics and Dis/Engaged Publics. Theory, Culture and Society, 34(2–3), 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414565717
Hutchins, B., & Lester, L. (2015). Theorizing The Enactment of Mediatized Environmental Conflict. International Communication Gazette, 77(4), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048514568765
Kaunda, C. J. (2021). Spirit Name (Ishina Lya Mupashi) and Strong Artificial Intelligence (Strong AI): A Bemba Theo-Cosmology Turn. Theology Today, 77(4), 460–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040573620956709
Kurki, M. (2015). Stretching Situated Knowledge: From Standpoint Epistemology to Cosmology and Back Again. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43(3), 779–797. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815583322
Putra, I. W. S., Made, Y. A. D. N., & Windya, I. M. (2024). TEOLOGI KEBUDAYAAN PADA RELIEF PURA DALÊM SANGSIT DESA SANGSIT KECAMATAN SAWAN KABUPATEN BULELENG. Sphatika: Jurnal Teologi, 15(2), 175-186.
Putra, I. W. (2022). Etika Lingkungan dalam Perspektif Filsafat Jaina. Jurnal Widya Katambung: Filsafat Agama Hindu, 45-55.
Mika, J. P., Dell, K., Elers, C., Dutta, M., & Tong, Q. (2022). Indigenous Environmental Defenders in Aotearoa New Zealand: Ihumatao and Oroua River. AlterNative, 18(2), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801221083164
Mingming, W. (2023). For Heaven-Human Conviviality: Reflections on Some ‘Ontological’ Narratives. Theory, Culture and Society, 1(1), 1–23.
Moewaka Barnes, H., Harmsworth, G., Tipa, G., Henwood, W., & Creanor, T. M. (2021). Indigenous-led Environmental Research in Aotearoa New Zealand: Beyond a Transdisciplinary Model for Best Practice, Empowerment and Action. AlterNative, 17(2), 306–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801211019397
Rao, M. (2016). Book Review: Subhadra Mitra Channa. 2013. The Inner and Outer Selves: Cosmology, Gender, and Ecology at the Himalayan Borders. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 50(2), 263–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0069966716635450
Rawson, A., & Mansfield, B. (2018). Producing Juridical Knowledge: “Rights of Nature” or The Naturalization of Rights? Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 1(1–2), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848618763807
Ritter, E., & Thaler, G. M. (2022). Technical Reform or Radical Justice? Environmental Discourse in Non-Governmental Organizations. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486221119750
Sage, C. (2014). The Transition Movement and Food Sovereignty: From Local Resilience to Global Engagement in Food System Transformation. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14(2), 254–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540514526281
Sheldrake, M. (2020). The ‘Enigma’ of Richard Schultes, Amazonian Hallucinogenic Plants, and The Limits of Ethnobotany. Social Studies of Science, 50(3), 345–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720920362
Sherma, R. D. (2021). Leading Change Through Sacred Ecopraxis: Cultivating Ecological Belonging as a Holy Task. Review & Expositor, 118(3), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/00346373211070629
Stolow, J., & Meyer, B. (2021). Enlightening Religion: Light and Darkness in Religious Knowledge and Knowledge About Religion. Critical Research on Religion, 9(2), 119–125.
Wasserman, E. (2021). Philosophical Cosmology and Religious Polemic: The “Worship of Creation” in The Writings of Philo of Alexandria and the Wisdom of Solomon. Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha, 31(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/09518207211041308
Whyte, K. P. (2018). Indigenous Science (Fiction) for The Anthropocene: Ancestral Dystopias and Fantasies of Climate Change Crises. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 1(1–2), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848618777621
